RG+self-evaluation

RG Sapphire

My presentation was to teach people something about Fred Thompson.

The strongest part of my wiki page was my biography. It had a lot of information about Fred's life.

My weakest part was the beliefs page. Although Fred Thompson has many great beliefs, some were too confusing for me to write about.

You can tell I planned it because I had more than one page of information and a lot of information in the biography.

I think that it does show academic growth because it wasnt all typing, and i linked all the pictures.

I think that i was creative in some ways because I had pictures of Fred acting on movies, but I did have a lot of typing that might have been boring.

I am proud of what I produced because I put a lot of effort into it and it can teach the reader a lot about Fred Thompson.

1) 9 2) 10 3) 7 ( I didnt take much notes. I typed as I read) 4) 9 5) 9 6) 9 7) 10 8) 8 9) 10

I believe I should get an A- or B+ on my wiki because I had a lot of information about my candidate, but not a perfect A+ because some of it was could have been boring, like the biography.