Rules+Essay...Ick

//**__ Your Experience Writing the Rules __**// //__[] __// Similar- -wanted freedom & indepentance Different -they debated on rules, we just discussed them //**__ Similarities and differences of the Rules __**// //**__ [] __**// Similar -1st amendment- frreedom of religion

Different -22nd amendment-we have elections every month they have them every 2 or 4 years

In this essay I will be telling the reader about my experience in writing rules in a sort of similar way to how the government made them. So, let's get this over with.

As the writers of the Constitution was writing the rules, they wanted their people to be free and independant, because they were leaving their king and didn't want a country similar to what it was. My group wanted our people to have freedom because we wanted our people to be happy. Our independance helped us to express ourselves. These rules helped the country grow, and probably would have helped our people prospire.

Something else that the writers did was debate the rules of the constitution. There really couldn't be any in between for, as an example, if there was a curfew. There either was or wasn't. Our group, however, found a way to just discuss the making of our rules. We comprimised as, for an example, there was no curfew but you can't disturb others. Even though we had different ways of writing rules, they were both good for the country.

Along with the way of writing the rules, the rules themselves are related. One of these relationships is Freedom of Religion. In the First Amendment it states that people have the Freedom of Religion. In our rules, we have the same statement. It's an important rule, because people should be allowed to worship whomever they choose to.

Another rule that is similar, is voting. We both have it. Theirs was every 2 to 4 years, according to the 22nd Amendment. Ours was every month. This way, we have different people with different opinions in charge.

Similarly different, we both had our ways of making rules, and the rules we made. They were all good for the people, and that's what counts.