Class+project

 In class one week, we had an assiment to create rules for our new “planet.” There are similarities between are constitution and the real constitution, but of course there are also differences.  While reserching good, strong rules, I noticed there are some similarities of what my group went through and the congress man went through. One of them is how we both had discussions on the rules being made. They had to think all of that through. We put a lot of effort into making the rules. Also we had some struggles just like them. It would be very hard to create a constitution just like them, and it would be very difficult. There are of course differences too though. The congress had four months to write it. Of course, four months to create strong rules for a whole country and it is still going, is amazing. We only had a few days to write our set of rules. That sounds like a short time, but we did what we had to do and we accomplished it. The founding fathers must be incredibility hard workers to accomplish the rules. The Great Compermise is all about of course, compromising. The delegetes all came from different back rounds, just like our team mates did. They also had different politcal veiws, just like us. Some people are democratic, and some our not. There is a delegate from Connecticut, and we are all from Connecticut so that is similar. Of course, there are differences again, and this time, there are more than the similarities. One difference is that there would be a two-house laglustalator, and we did not do anything like that really. Another would be The House Of Reps would include one representitve for 30,000 people in one state. Signing the Constitution did not include 4,300 words in two days for us, although it did for real life. The Constitution did not have as much at all signers for us, although it did for them and it did not happen on September 17. It is considered for our planet a piece of historical evidence though.  The Bill Of Rights was that not everyone agreed to the Constitution, and we did not think up of something like that. There were by 1789, and we did do it by 2010. They really did think it out and put a lot of effort into it, and honestly, we did not really even think of having one. The Founding Fathers though about braking it up, and we wanted to keep it together everything. They had borders and we did not have any because we are an all new planet. The Three Branches of government is broken into Ecseutive, Leglislative, and Judicial Branches. Each has something headed by something or someone different. For our planet we just have a Excecutive Branch, but not in that name, but it is headed by the president. They thought to avoid risk of collision, just to split up into three different forms of goverement, to make it a little bit of everything, when our Planet is just one leader, and a back up one. (vise president) Checks and balances is so each does not become to powerful. This is a very smart idea. We did not come up with anything like this because we only had one leader, the president, and you can not be to powerful. Women has the right to vote in both places, USA and our planet. We felt that, just like the founding fathers, women should also be able express them selves and let them also take control in our politics, not just men. Today has so many rules and such, and in the future, I believe there will be even more rules seeing how great our country went when Our Fathers made up the Constitution.