final+projectherkyf09

Tag your sources in [] with Civilwar, your name, and the topic Example tag= civilwar, paulb, africanamericansoldiers, soldiers, images
 * Every source you use is to be listed in your [|bibliography]. Every source you quote is to be cited in your paper or presentation.
 * Topic: One day**


 * Focus: if a general made a differnt move they could have won the battle of bull run**

if a general made a different move then the north could have won the battle.**
 * Reason for choice:

Need some "starters" to help you brainstorm a thesis? Give your thesis the thesis test
 * What's your point? ([|thesis]): my point is to show that if a general made a differnt move then the north could have won the battle of bull run.**

INFO:--The union was under command of Brigadier General Irvin McDowell and under him were 5 other people which were Tyler, Hunter, Heintzelman, Runyan, and Miles commading the forces and leading them to battle. --the south was divided in two sections1. 13 commanders under Stuart 2. Brigadier General Pierre G. T. Beauregard was commading beside his partner Brigadier General Joseph E. Johnston. HOW THE BATTLE WENT: both armies were going to do the same thing, attack the fronty line with a small faint attack and then hit them by the other side when they were distrated by the faint attack. when the north attacked with the faint attack the south fought them, but general Shank noticed that the north wasnt attacking hard so they though that it was just a distraction so they moved their troopds to the north and then they found the north coming at them and since the north wasnt ready they got hit and lost the battle. The dowfall of the north was because they almost took 2 hours to get where they were supposed to be so thats why the south noticed that the first hit was only a distraction and not the whole army. although the south won it wasnt a very clear win most people say it was just a tie and that the south did not win.8HOW COULD THE NORTH HAVE WON THE BATTLE:the north could have won the battle if they sent a faint attack to front line and then when they saw that they took too long to get where they were supposed to be, they should have sent another faint attack and attacked with their full force from the other side ( the back side) and destroyed the south. POEM: two armies looking for the win two titans going to kill

the north and south fought for a reason to kill anyone going against their reason

it was the battle of bull run which made many families run

General Irvin McDowell was the general of the north counsel

the south was divide in two which made commading positions few

General Pierre G. T. Beauregard along with General Joseph E. Johnston stood in one part of the south trying to wipe out boston

while on the other part stood Stuart trying to destroy the north apart

both armies knew how they there going to attack a faint attack to the front and destroy them from the back

the north went first, they attacked the south's front line trying to give the other commanders some time to guide

shank, one of the lower commanders of the south noticed that the north was not attacking the south

shank told the generals and they though it was a distraction which made the south take action

the south haded north to catch north by suprise while the north would think they would caching the south by suprise

when the south found them they kill them before the north had a chance but the north didnt give up they ketp fighting but evetually lost their only chance

although the the south won it said that both armies tied becausae both armies lost many men and it did not go right

the north lost because they took to much to get were they were supposed to be the south cauth them and destroyed the north and were very mean

What are four various secondary sources you have found before your research? [] [] [] [] What are two primary sources you have found to help your research? [] []
 * What four reasons do you have that will back up your point?**

1

2

3

4


 * What is your first reason and three to five facts to support it?**

What can you conclude from these facts?

Sources:


 * What is your second reason and three to five facts to support it?**

What can you conclude from these facts?

Sources


 * What is your third reason and three to five facts to support it?**

What can you conclude from these facts?

Sources


 * What is your fourth reason and three to five facts to support it?**

What can you conclude from these facts?

Sources


 * Based on your research, what conclusions would you make and how does your research connect to your life?**

Ideas on how you are going to present? Involve the class? Be exciting? Interesting? Wow? Huh? Ahhh? ||